How CONSYRION AI works – from your question to a reasoned decision

Example scenario – illustration, not live data.

1. 01CONSYRION AI

   Debate. Decide. Build.Debate.Decide.Build.

   Several AI models think independently, challenge each other and reach a documented verdict with evidence. You approve – then CONSYRION AI can build it as a reviewed pull request.

   Start a DecisionSee How It Works

2. 02BEFORE THE COUNCIL

   Your question becomes a brief

   Create a project and describe the decision. Choose the models and up to twelve perspectives. You connect your own provider keys and set a hard token budget – CONSYRION AI sells no AI credits.

   EXAMPLEQuestion: “Which database architecture should our SaaS product use?” – three models, twelve perspectives, a budget on your own keys.

   • Project, question and context
   • Models and perspectives you pick
   • Your own API keys, your budget

3. 03PHASE 1

   Independent Thinking

   Every model receives the identical brief and works on its own. Answers stay sealed until all are in – no model can see or copy another.

   EXAMPLEModel A drafts a managed multi-tenant database, B a self-hosted cluster, C a hybrid – none of them sees the others.

4. 04PHASE 2

   Open Council

   All proposals are revealed at once and laid out side by side as equals. You compare the alternatives while the models ask each other precise questions.

   EXAMPLESide by side: A is fastest to launch, B gives the most control, C balances both. B asks A how tenants are kept apart.

5. 05PHASE 3

   12 Minds Council

   Roles such as architecture, security, cost and critic unfold around the models and test every proposal. Twelve perspectives are roles – not twelve extra models or votes.

   EXAMPLEThe security role checks tenant isolation, the cost role compares running costs, the critic looks for weak spots.

6. 06PHASE 4

   Minority Review

   A substantiated objection is highlighted and checked against evidence by independent models. Dissent is recorded – never smoothed away.

   EXAMPLEOne objection stands out: in A, a misconfiguration could let tenants see each other’s data. Evidence: test results and provider docs.

7. 07PHASE 5

   Consensus Round

   Authors revise their proposals against the objections; compatible ideas can merge into a hybrid option. Differences that remain stay documented.

   EXAMPLEA adds per-tenant keys and merges with C into “Hybrid A + C”. B’s cost concern stays documented.

8. 08PHASE 6

   Final Verdict

   Recommendation, independent scores, evidence and the minority position come together in one decision report. Nothing is built at this point.

   EXAMPLERecommendation: Hybrid A + C – with scores for security, cost and time to launch, and the security objection on record.

9. 09HUMAN APPROVAL

   You decide

   Approve, choose an alternative, ask for more debate, request changes or reject. A proposal with an open critical security objection cannot be approved. Without your approval nothing is built.

   EXAMPLEYou approve Hybrid A + C – or ask for one more round on cost first.

10. 10PHASE 7 · OPTIONAL

    Execution Council

    Only after your approval: the decision becomes tasks, code in an isolated sandbox, tests and independent reviews – delivered as a GitHub draft pull request. Decisions work without a build, and merge and deployment stay your separate decisions.

    EXAMPLETasks: schema, per-tenant keys, migration tests – opened as a draft pull request in your repository.

11. 11FROM QUESTION TO DECISION

    From your question to a reasoned decision – optionally all the way to reviewed code.

    Your keys, your providers, your approval. Every step leaves evidence you can follow.

    Start a DecisionSign in